Week of November 2nd, 2009. What is going on in Detroit?

November 4th, 2009

A strong US Dollar should be a priority for US monetary and fiscal authorities. If the US dollar continues to lose ground against other major currencies, investing in US assets become less desirable to foreign investors. Because of the inverse relationship between bond prices and interest rates, as the deficit grows, the availability of US treasury securities increases, bond prices decline and interest rates rise leading to inflation. And as we all know, inflation reduces the value of real assets.

To think that the US dollar volatility can be ignored because foreign investors have too much to lose to allow the collapse of the dollar seems shortsighted. Foreign investors such as China are stocking commodity inventories and could over time significantly reduce their exposure to the US dollar. Such actions would indicate lack of confidence in the US dollar.

On a different note, Ford Motors Co. reported earnings on Monday along with some promising forecasts. As you read the press release, think about the actions Ford Motor Company has taken over the last year. What are the key factors that differentiate Ford’s turnaround strategy from GM’s?

Week of October 26, 2009. What about the Dollar!

October 26th, 2009

More a more foreign countries, who have traditionally been investors of US Treasury Securities, are expressing concerns about the weakness of the US Dollar in the global marketplace. China and oil producing countries are at the center of the debate and are encouraging international finance authorities to review the effects of the weak US Dollar.

Do you think we will see the Euro replace the US Dollar in international market transactions over the next decade? Why? Or, why not?
What effect can the current US deficit have on the US Dollar?
Why is it important for the US to maintain a strong US Dollar and why are monetary authorities not pursuing a strong US Dollar policy right now?
What kind of effect can a weak Dollar have in the US financial markets and the economic recovery as a whole?

Week of October 12, 2009. The Future of E-mail Communications.

October 11th, 2009

In today’s Wall Street Journal, you can find an article discussing the future of e-mail communications and how social networks are changing the way we communicate with others.

The article, The Email Reign Is Over , begins with the following paragraph:
“Email has had a good run as king of communications, but its reign is over. In its place, a new generation of services is starting to take hold— Twitter, Facebook and countless others. And just as email did, this shift promises to profoundly rewrite the way we communicate—in ways we can only begin to imagine.”

How do you feel about the changes discussed in this article? What kind of impact do you think these changes will have in the business environment? More specifically, in the way firms conduct business with consumers in the United States?

Week of October 5th, 2009. What kind of business ideas can succeed in a recession?

October 4th, 2009

Some great ideas on generating long term sustainable economic growth were posted last week. I noticed that most bloggers talked about government intervention, either using fiscal policy or government spending to generate long term economic growth. Let’s assume for this blog that we don’t need to worry about government, taxation, or credit markets. In addition, let’s assume that this economic slowdown will last longer than anticipated. Under these conditions, is it possible to start a profitable business?

If you do a little research, you will find that some of the greatest business ideas were launched during a recession. Remember that solving society’s problems can be profitable! Can you find companies that are doing just that this time around?

Week of September 28, 2009. Long Term Sustainable Economic Growth. Is it possible in the US?

September 28th, 2009

One of the disadvantages of GDP is that it does not tell us how wealth or economic growth is distributed among a country’s population; nonetheless, along with other economic indicators, it is used to develop economic policy intended to improve the lives of people living in the United States. The problem with this practice? Short term GDP can be manipulated by programs such as “Cash for Clunkers” which can generate a short term increase in GDP but cannot generate long term sustainable economic growth nor lasting industrial production and employment.

A better measure of economic growth to set economic policy in the US would be the ratio of middle class real income growth to real GDP growth and its trend over time (by real I mean adjusted for inflation). If this ratio were greater than 1, we could expect inflation; but as the number gets closer to 0, we could anticipate hard economic times ahead as the middle class income growth won’t be able to support or absorb increases in GDP.

In addition, we could also use such economic measure to evaluate the effectiveness of economic policy and could hold government officials to higher standards to make sure taxpayers’ money is managed in a way that generates not only short term increases in GDP, but also, long term economic growth for the middle class. As the middle class income grows, employment will also grow due to consumer spending and everyone -individuals, business, government and non-profit organizations- will benefit because the invisible hand takes over.

Of course, the challenge for US elected officials is to develop economic policy that has less to do with political ideologies and more with generating long term sustainable economic growth that can directly benefit US taxpayers. Can you think of ways to generate long term sustainable economic growth using economic policy?

Week of September 21,2009. What can GDP tell us about the economy?

September 20th, 2009

Last week, we talked about a report published by the census bureau reporting that in 2007, after adjusting for inflation, middle income Americans experienced the lowest income level since 1997.

Your assignment was to comment on the kind of impact that middle income Americans would likely have in the US economy going forward and how it will impact consumer spending which represents about 2/3 of the US economy.

In my opinion, the US is about to move from a market driven economy to a government driven economy. The numbers reported by the US Census Bureau revealed what many middle income Americans already knew, their disposable incomes are stagnant or declining. Furthermore, the inflation-adjusted value of their investments, both fixed and non-fixed, have declined over the last ten years forcing middle income Americans to cut back on spending. Second quarter GDP statistics reveal that personal consumption expenditures were down 1%, non-residential fixed expenditures were down 10.9%, and residential fixed expenditures were down 22.8%. At the same time, Government spending increased 11% during the second quarter. With unemployment approaching 10%, I expect to see this trend to continue. Government spending will likely increase as a component of GDP as consumer spending continues to decline. As a result, I would expect the government to continue to spend on economic stimulus programs to try to generate short term economic growth as measured by GDP, and in the process, it will become the decisive player determining economic growth in the US for the next few years.

Nevertheless, economic stimulus programs designed to influence GDP in the short term may not generate long term, sustainable economic growth. According to Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke, the US recession is likely over but unemployment is expected to remain high at current levels through 2010.

How is it possible that a recession can be over and unemployment can remain at about 10% even after 12 to 18 months? Is it GDP alone a good measure of economic growth? Or is it unemployment and national disposable income growth a better measure of a country’s real economic growth?

Finally, your first Blog! Have fun!

September 13th, 2009

Happy to see almost everyone has registered, and even happier to see that you are helping one another with technical issues! Great!

Last week the census bureau reported that in 2007, after adjusting for inflation, middle income Americans experienced the lowest income level since 1997.

What kind of impact are middle income Americans likely to have in the US economy going forward? How will this impact consumer spending which represents about 2/3 of the US economy?

I will share my thoughts on this with you next week after you have a chance to voice your opinion.

Non-Profit Fundraising Message Appeal

August 6th, 2009

Building Bridges through Music, Inc. is organizing a gambling fundraising event for the fall of 2009. They need your help to develop an advertising strategy that will draw 100 affluent gamblers to the event. Help them develop a “message” by using the information you learned in Chapter 9. Be creative and have fun!

Where are the Red Sox drawing revenue from?

August 6th, 2009

With the smallest ballpark, one of the highest payrolls, and home games that have been sold out since 2003; how is it that the Red Sox organization has been able to increase revenues? Where is the money coming from?

You will be surprise! Do a little research and have fun!

It’s all about inventories!

August 3rd, 2009

Surprisingly, according to initial GDP reports for the second quarter, US GDP contracted by only 1% during the second quarter vs. a decline of 6.4% in the first quarter and a decline of 5.4% during last year’s fourth quarter. But, what is the story behind the decline of only 1%? It’s rather simple, inventories!

Inventory accumulation let to an unavoidable economic downturn in US manufacturing and now we are beginning to see the reverse. Inventory levels are so low that we will unavoidably see economic activity pickup in the manufacturing sector to rebuild those inventories. As a result, we are likely to experience economic growth over the next two quarters.

So far, according to CNBC reports, 74% of companies have reported earnings that top estimates, which could mean that analysts expected the decline in business activity to be worst than it actually turned out to be, or that analysts underestimated the ability of US companies to manage their business activity during this economic downturn by cutting costs.

Nevertheless, unemployment remains high and will likely exceed 10% by mid 2010. Whether this recent pick up in economic activity results in an increase of part time or full time employment remains to be seen. I believe employment is the key measure to sustainable economic growth; therefore, until we see employment numbers improve, the economy remains fragile. Because the US is facing high unemployment and higher taxes which don’t normally work in favor of economic growth and because they do not generate growth in disposable income, high employment is key to sustaining this GDP good news momentum given the current political and economic conditions.

But how can we improve employment, consumer confidence, and control oil prices at the same time? Should we have more regulation and taxes, or should we offer more incentives and tax cuts? Can we improve US net disposable income with high unemployment and higher taxes? And what about the housing market?

So far, I just see inventory levels low, I still do not see housing and unemployment numbers improve significantly just yet. I remain optimistic because I believe in the invisible hand, which I feel will work faster and more efficiently if left alone. Eventually, we will see economic activity pick up and housing and employment will improve. But we still need to see what will happen with health-care reform and how it will affect the US economy as a whole. I think we are still facing uncertainty in the markets and we have about another year to go before the government/business relationship becomes clear. Until then, I remain cautiously optimistic and would continue to look at emerging markets with open market policies that encourage economic growth and would be very selective to pick business in the US that won’t be surprisingly affected by government regulation. I would continue to concentrate on infrastructure and green energy for both, new employment and investment opportunities.

Share your thoughts, tell us how you feel about this current upward momentum and what you think these numbers really mean to you!